Archive for October 2013
On 7 October 2013 septagenarian Norquay resident Wilma Yerex was struck by an automobile in a marked pedestrian crosswalk on Earles Street at Euclid. She died the next day.
An 18 October 2013 story in the Vancouver Courier  includes comment from fellow senior Miriam Mattila, who says yet another senior was killed in the same spot eight years ago.
This occurrence typifies the nastiness of the all take no give mass rezoning that slunk into the heart of East Vancouver disguised the as Norquay Village Neighbourhood Centre Plan.
Mattila and another neighbour were part of the Norquay Village Neighbourhood planning process back in 2010, she said, and they brought up the issue of the intersection. She said there was discussion at the time about a pedestrian crossing light being put in but it never materialized.
Very little has materialized for Norquay except land grabbing and density dumping. And the immediate sequestration of a $3 million CAC from the 2013 rezoning of 2220 Kingsway.
Repeated calls for a safe crosswalk across Nanaimo Street at East 27th Avenue have been likewise ignored — even while hundreds of new residents pour into densified development along Kingsway between Gladstone and Nanaimo.
The Norquay Plan purported to want a more walkable neighborhood, but no consideration is being given to the natural pedestrian route that these additional new bodies will take to reach the Nanaimo SkyTrain station.
Does the City of Vancouver have to see a minimum body count before it will take any action? At least two schoolgirls were struck on Nanaimo at Brock before a real crosswalk with a real stoplight was installed a few years ago.
 Jennifer Thuncher. Senior wants safer Euclid/Earles intersection. Vancouver Courier 104:84
(18 Oct 2013) A8
[ Comment posted in response to Ann McAfee on CBC Early Edition mythologizing a happy past for Kingsway & Knight “neighbourhood centre” planning … under her direction. The episode aired after the large 24 September 2013 Tuesday evening demonstration in front of City Hall, and before the 25 September 2013 late Wednesday beginning on the Council agenda item for Community Plans: Next Steps ]
Vancouver’s first-ever mass rezoning may have, at best, proved a little less immediately unhappy than the escalating wars that have occurred since: Norquay, Mount Pleasant, Downtown Eastside, West End, Grandview-Woodland, Marpole.
On 25 September 2013 General Manager of Planning and Development Brian Jackson used his presentation  on the state of four new community plans to sail off into supposed “myth busting.” It seems far clearer that one of his predecessors, Ann McAfee, had just been engaging in outrageous “myth pushing” about the history of mass rezoning in Vancouver (aided and abetted by CBC Radio).
An earlier posting has already scrutinized in detail the consequences of the pretend piece of planning done for Kingsway & Knight.
This comment sets out to rebut (with specifics drawn from relevant City of Vancouver minutes) a number of facile and distorted claims made by the former senior City of Vancouver planner.
Let this commentary be read as an earlier case study in how the City of Vancouver spins, misinforms, rewrites history, and … lies — all in the service of forcing its unwanted planning onto ever more savvy and resistant local communities.
When it comes to rezonings, local communities can expect all take, no give from the City of Vancouver — followed up by trash talk about what was “given” to the community.
* * * * * *
Density Discontent — 25 Sept 2013
Rick Cluff interviews Ann McAfee (Co-Director of Planning 1994-2006 for City of Vancouver)
Early Edition — CBC British Columbia
Transcript of segment: 3:28 to 4:42
Can you give us an example of a neighborhood that was actually happy with development?
Well, interestingly, about ten years ago, Knight and Kingsway, which is now King Edward Village — and if you drive past there, there’s this massive development — it’s about 400 units, high-rise, plus, what you can’t see, about a thousand units of properties around, were all rezoned for townhouses, rowhouses, infill — plus that big development. And, when it came to public hearing in 2004, the community came out and supported. They were cheering council when they approved the rezoning. Now, why did they cheer council? I think partly they had worked through some of the where am I going to live in the future where are my children going to live — but they also got some benefits. The big development, if you go and look at it, has the whole ground floor as a combination of a grocery store which they didn’t have at the time, and the new library. So the community could see that they were getting something out of the tradeoff between density and types of housing in the neighborhood.
* * * * * *
One — … about a thousand units of properties around …
Fact: 1577 properties were taken out of RS-1 zoning. That is about 60% more than described and looks like dishonest minimization.
Two — … when it came to public hearing in 2004, the community came out and supported. They were cheering …
Fact: There was no public hearing in 2004. See Appendix.
Fact: Minutes record considerable opposition expressed at the 2003 public hearing for the rezoning of King Edward Village (a one-off blockbusting of the “neighbourhood centre” that came prior to the area planning — which was never completed). Even speakers reported as “in favor” commented on late public notification.
Three — The big development, if you go and look at it, has the whole ground floor as a combination of a grocery store which they didn’t have at the time, and the new library.
Fact: The whole ground floor is ridiculous exaggeration of a single-building library and grocery store footprint that amounts to perhaps one-quarter to one-third of the total ground floor commercial space created.
Fact: A grocery store is not a public amenity; it is a self-interested commercial enterprise. When a grocery store that was promised  at the 2006 rezoning of the two-acre Eldorado Motel property failed to materialize, then Director of Planning Brent Toderian (at the Development Permit Board approval) asserted that allocation of retail space was not anything that planners could make happen. Yet earlier (24 January 2006) the inclusion of a grocery store was presented as a significant condition of the rezoning.
Fact: The new library (a) was not new — it was a relocation of the existing library that was on the opposite side of Knight Street (b) did not create permanent space owned by City of Vancouver — it was nothing more than a ten-year-only no-payment-for-lease-of-space sweetheart deal with the developer (c) did even not include the finishing and furnishing of the space, a cost that the City of Vancouver paid to the developer.
Four — … the community could see that they were getting something out of the tradeoff …
Fact: The City of Vancouver snookered a naive and trusting community that today is able to look back and see what a pack of lies it was fed.
 Community Plans: Next Steps — Downtown Eastside, West End, Marpole, Grandview-Woodland (September 25, 2013)
 “The commercial uses would be focussed towards Kingsway and include: a 2 622 m² (28,224 sq. ft.) grocery store” (p. 4)
4. REZONING: 2330 Kingsway [CD-1 Rezoning — 2330-2372 Kingsway and 2319 East 30th Avenue]
• • • • • •
The official record from City of Vancouver minutes includes:
2003 — The premature piece of Vancouver’s first “neighbourhood centre” that was approved at the 24 July 2003 public hearing on CD-1 rezoning for King Edward Village:
2. Rezoning – 1402-1436 Kingsway and 4050 Knight Street
Correspondence: 9 letters of support; 5 letters of opposition; 1 petition with approximately 190 signatures in opposition
Speakers: 18 in support; 7 in opposition / expressing concerns
2004 — The report that set in motion the Kingsway & Knight mass rezoning that was approved at a 8 July 2004 meeting:
3. Kingsway and Knight Neighbourhood Centre: Housing Area Plan (File 8011)
Speakers: 2 in favor, 1 with concerns
2005 — The two new zoning schedules to implement the mass rezoning of 1577 single-family properties that were approved at a 6 October 2005 public hearing:
4. AREA REZONING: Kingsway and Knight Housing Plan (RT-10/RT-10N and RM-1/RM-1N)
Correspondence: 1 letter of support
Speakers: 2 support, 1 concerned about potential property tax increase
• • • • • •